Just another damn group blog!
A short time ago, I wanted to add to the pdf mini-stories on my website. I took my time, did the formatting, found pictures I liked, made simple covers with the microsoft paint tool, and e-mailed the packages to my kind webmistress.
When the time came to make the books, she sent me a blunt e-mail in return and asked, “Where is your NAME, woman?”
It was there, on the covers. Really it was. Just not very large.
(I might add that the final versions were beautifully done).
I remember someone once telling me that the measure of an author’s success was how much room their name took up on their covers. I remember laughing at the time. And I remember pausing afterward to think about that a bit.
The last few times I’ve browsed a couple of best-selling authors who shall remain nameless, the titles were not exceptionally large. That’s not to mention finding the author’s photo on the first turning of pages, then two pages of rave reviews, then two of the backlist, then the biography before finally getting to the blurb about the current work (and by that time I honestly didn’t much care).
When I first started trying to write professionally, I really wanted “Raine Weaver” to have very little to do with it. I thought the website was probably necessary for books, news, etc. Didn’t honestly want to blog, since I’m really not a chatty person and wouldn’t have much to say (ha!). Never really wanted minions to come knocking at my door, have never even posted a photo of myself online.
I wanted the work to speak for me. For itself. Period.
I’ll readily admit now that was probably naive. People want to ‘know’ the authors they really like, and it is difficult, I think, for the author to separate the work from the ego sometimes. We don’t just want to write, after all. We want to share. We want the work to be read.
And I suppose that means putting together little packages for display. They are important, as is a certain amount of ego.
I just have to wonder sometimes about letting that aspect of it take charge. Hate the idea of deluding myself, like an American Idol wannabee. I hate the idea that being published might become more important to me than what I’m writing. When I’m feeling tired or battered or bullet-ridden as an author, is it because the work isn’t as good as I’d like it to be—or is it because I have unrealistic expectations?
Shouldn’t it be mostly about the writing after all?
Or is that an illusion?
Dennie ~
March 26th, 2010 at 7:57 am
I think it depends on your end-game. I think any author who sets out to get published wants the La Nora fame and glory but realistically it’s only that for a very few folks. I think all writers start out w/ the Idol Wannabe mantra of “I’m good dammit.” Some are, some eh and some holy crap they’re delusional.
Then you have to tailor your goals to fit what is working and … Oh hell I don’t necessarily know. But , I think you do have to have a little bit of naivety in the beginning or you’d never wade in to the publishing world. Once you’re in though you have to figure it out as you go. I don’t think I answered that at all!
Charlene Teglia
March 26th, 2010 at 10:08 am
Well, writing is writing, publishing is publishing. Writing is about the writing. But publishing is about selling the books so people can read what you’ve written. That means using tried-and-true sales techniques like testimonials (review quotes, cover quotes), and conveying something about your book and about you that’s unique. For instance, Dean Koontz and his relationship with dogs and CCI. Knowing he writes about dogs and gives to Canine Companions for Independence is something likeable, maybe making you inclined to pick up one of his books, and then his writing has a chance to hook you.
BernardL
March 26th, 2010 at 10:41 am
We write because we want people to read what we’ve written. That involves a healthy ego. When the time miraculously comes along and your book is for sale, the ego capable of writing the novel, selling it to a publisher, and knowing it will be highly regarded goes on sabbatical. All that’s left is us. Some relish the extra attention as a well earned benefit while I think the majority of authors go ‘uh oh, what the hell happened to my secluded writer delusion?’ – ‘I don’t sit for endless hours creating a fictional world so my escapist fiction can catapult me into reality!’
Make it so the fiction earns a fortune in book sales and movie rights and then look out baby. Secluded writer who? Recluse author what?
Raine
March 26th, 2010 at 10:56 am
But , I think you do have to have a little bit of naivety in the beginning or you’d never wade in to the publishing world. Once you’re in though you have to figure it out as you go.
Well, I got the naivete part right anyway, lol.
You’re probably right, Dennie.
If we knew then what we know now?
Raine
March 26th, 2010 at 11:01 am
Charli, I loved Dean’s Trixie.
I’d been reading him anyway, but clicking with the dog didn’t hurt. You’re right.
But one thing I’ve noticed (could be just me) is that when I first started thinking of pubbing, I’d write my story as I thought it should be written, and then think about where to send it.
Now I’m considering the marketing almost as soon as the idea is half-solidified.
Maybe that’s more ‘professional’. Dunno.
Raine
March 26th, 2010 at 11:07 am
Dang, Bernard, that’s a depressing thought, lol! And it’s so funny, because while I think most writers have the occasionaly fantasy of being a ‘big author’, I think the writing itself is still the true siren’s song.
Melissa Blue
March 26th, 2010 at 12:47 pm
Oh, I absolutely believe if I knew all that I know about publishing now I wouldn’t be here. I mean really it’s like the first date. You don’t tell the person all your faults, you just don’t. You want them to like you. So when you do open that closet full of skeletons, bad habits and crazy they’re hooked.
As for should it only be about the writing? I say no. Writing is first and foremost about making a connection. That connection may be about the characters or the plot for the writer. For the reader it’s about connecting the story to the person who wrote it. It’s probably a primitive instinct.
Lynn
March 26th, 2010 at 9:07 pm
Shouldn’t it be mostly about the writing after all?
Or is that an illusion?
I think it’s different for everyone based on what they want. Some people want the 72 pt. byline, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Nothing wrong with not wanting it, either.
I can tell you that when your byline begins to eclipse your title, the publisher will not downsize it. Once you generate enough sales, they become more interested in selling you to the readers than anything you write. The requests for public appearances, video interviews and other promo featuring your face instead of your work quadruple. That’s probably the most dangerous territory for anyone who doesn’t want to objectify themselves to sell their work.
Raine
March 27th, 2010 at 8:55 am
Writing is first and foremost about making a connection. That connection may be about the characters or the plot for the writer. For the reader it’s about connecting the story to the person who wrote it.
Agree, with qualifications, Mel.
The writers’ connection is via the characters, plots, themes, words.
I’m not sure a reader needs to connect that story to a person. ‘Anonymous’ is a very popular author in classical lit.
Raine
March 27th, 2010 at 9:05 am
Once you generate enough sales, they become more interested in selling you to the readers than anything you write…That’s probably the most dangerous territory for anyone who doesn’t want to objectify themselves to sell their work.
Gawd, that would seriously freak me out. As you said–nothing wrong with wanting it, but I think we already pour ourselves into the work. Just not what I personally wanted, I guess.
Bernita
March 31st, 2010 at 8:16 am
“We don’t just want to write, after all. We want to share.”
Me too.
Don’t know how to “objectify” myself. Maybe if I did, I wouldn’t feel so timid about the next part.