June 26, 2007
Larry has left the building
*Let me start by saying I don’t profess, proclaim or otherwise feel portrayed in theses assessments of authors/artists.
I have been thinking of writers’ readers and wonder about sales versus readership. Now you’d think these go hand in hand but I am not entirely sure. The best way I can portray this is through comparison to two singers—both Country and Western singers. Both have the same number of albums out. Both are signed with big
I have been to see both in concert locally. This is where the difference first became apparent to me. Artist A—we’ll call him, Curly. And Artist B—hence forth known as Moe.
Curly’s concert: He had the crowd going; I mean the room was filled to capacity with overflow out in the wait area. People cheering, screaming and all get out letting their thong—though it should have stayed hid—playing peek-a-boo to the beat of his third number-one hit. Everyone knows the words to the songs—a four-year-old got on stage and sang two choruses all by his lonesome.
It was AWESOME!
Cut to Moe’s concert: The room was maybe half-full—many empty tables. Management never even turned the lights down all the way. People sat and listened to the music, some cheers went up on occasion but for the most part—it felt sedated.
Now lest you think I may have left details out—the men are twenty DAYS apart. They have the same type of music and, I thought, appeal to the same group of C&W listeners. Not so much apparently.
Now here comes the part I don’t get—Moe, the sedated crowd Moe, has the better “career”. He is touted all over the music scene. Everyone “knows” him. Curly, not so much. Most of the not dyed-in-the-wool fans who know him, know him due to a less than thrilling misadventure.
In the writing world, I see the same thing. I see authors from big houses with big advances and their name everywhere, but no one seems to have read them. And then you have semi-sorta-cult-fashion authors who everyone had read who have a so-so career.
So it would seem Moe is the better, more famous artist of the two if you go by money alone. Curly is the more popular artist if you go by cheering, crazed, stalker-ish fans. At the end of the day, can you say one is better than the other?



Hmmmmm I think Moe is the Nashville Machine. And Curly is like the paperback writer of publishing. Maybe he just does what he does out of love for what he does. I see this a lot with Gary Allen who also has a great fanbase but gets little industry accolades (and unlike Curly doesn’t advertise all his personal woes etc). OTOH for hte most part, Gary doesn’t seem to give a shit about the awards anyway. I could be wrong, but that just doesn’t seem like his gig.
More hmmm…
Maybe it depends on what you mean by “better”.
Moe will get the big deals, big concert money, publicity, etc. But Curly will get the die-hard fans, I guess.
And chances are if Curly keeps it up, somebody in NY—er, Nashville will notice, and he’ll be the next Moe.
And then there’s poor Larry, still playin’ the gin joints and singin’ the blues…
Ames–you’re probably right!
Raine–Curly will undoubtably end up shootg himself in the foot (again) and in the long run–he’s great but has no follow through.
“Better” is probably not the correct verbage, but in terms of better/worse some folks are all about the numbers so I am guessing it depends on which side of the cowpoke you stand on as to which “numbers” makes you say “yeehaw.”
but you gott watch out for that Larry–he may come from nowhere and steal both their fanbase :-)
he’s great but has no follow through.
hehehe…sounds familiar too huh!