It could be somewhat perilous for an author to kill off characters. Don’t you think? I mean, there are rumors that JK is going to axe Harry Potter. After all, she would never get any peace if she didn’t because folks would want her to continue to write his story.

And who was the famous mystery writer that killed off his main character and it outraged readers so much, he had to revive him? I can’t remember.

Anyway. The point is…sometimes, you just gotta take ‘em out. But how? I mean, if you have a secondary character you eighty-six in the story, does that mean that character wasn’t necessary to the plot of the story after all? I wonder about this.

And the reason I’m wondering about this is because I have a character in one of my books I’m considering giving the heave-ho to. So I wonder - IS this character necessary to the plot? I mean, he sort of is. He is an integral part in the backstory (which of course is NOT an info dump - har har) and he effectively shapes the current events of the story. But when #1 Bad Guy gets wind he’s still alive, well, our villain wants him six feet under.

And fast.

So I intend to murder him - in the most vicious and villainous way as only our Baddie can do.

So, readers, does it piss you off when an author kills off a character (even a secondary one)? Or do you cheer the hero on that much more?