December 1, 2006
The Big “R”
Since Mik brought up the subject (and I’ve got nothing better to blog about…
), let’s talk about REJECTION.
If you’re a wannabee author, or just getting started, and you’re involved with writing chat rooms, message boards, and author support groups, I’ve got news for you. (And please remember, this is just my opinion).
Despite what your writing buddies say, There Is No Such Thing As A “Good” Rejection.
If anybody tells you differently, they’re trying to make you feel better. Nothing wrong with that, of course. But it’s a little like having them come to visit you in the hospital after a car crash and saying, “Well, good thing you only lost one leg in the accident!”
Rejections are hard. They’re part of the process, unless you’re one of the “chosen ones”, but they still hurt. They punch a hole in your heart and shred your confidence, that belief in yourself you need to get there in the first place.
Sure, some are easier to take than others. Like learning to walk—you WILL fall, hurt the butt, scrape the knees, stub the toes, bang into sharp edges.
The worst rejections are the ones that never garner a response at all, as if they fell off the face of the earth. This is followed closely by the dreaded form letter. No comments, no feedback, no clue. I hear a lot of newbie writers despair about this. “If only they’d tell me something!”
Well, as one who’s still a dues-paying member of the Wannabees, I’m here to tell ya—it ain’t necessarily so. I, and I’m sure some of you, have gotten feedback from submissions that made me just as frustrated as none at all.
Examples?
“Good plot, interesting characters, and you’ve obviously got talent. But you take much too long to get to the sex, dear.” ~~(response from agent to first–yes, FIRST–15 pages of a SWEET romance).
“You have a lyrical voice, intriguing plot, and I absolutely adore your characters. I read this manuscript over several times and loved each reading—but I’m afraid it’s not for us.” ~~(editor at small press who made me go “HUH??” and develop a taste for Southern Comfort).
“In response to your question as to whether any of the five manuscripts you’ve submitted per my requests could be revised and re-submitted, I’m afraid my answer would have to be no. Although I love your writing and the novels were very impressive, it’s simply easier for me to evaluate new work. I look forward to your next submission.” ~~(editor at large press after 2 years’ worth of submissions—so glad it was easier for HER).
I’ve heard rejections that were so glowing, the writer was SURE they were on the verge of success. But those ‘glowing rejections’ went on for years and years. Very wearing on the psyche. Rejection is hard, even if you teeter on the edge a bit before you fall in. You fall, either way.
Just watch those sharp edges.



Interesting post, Raine.
I’ll give you my theory when it comes to some of those glowing rejections. It means there’s something in the writing and the story that the editor really REALLY likes. (This is a good thing, but just not enough!)
Unfortunately there is something else in the story and writing that the editor doesn’t like, or at least doesn’t think will sell. I’m not even sure they can always put their finger on it. But if this is part of your core writing, well, the glowing rejections might just keep on coming.
Still and all, some of the praise from rejections has kept me going. But the distance between a ‘good’ rejection and an acceptance is farther than some people think.
So, it’s not like you hang on and save every single rejection you’ve received, is it? LOL
Rejection is part of life, period. Is the “no, I treasure your friendship too much” comment any easier of a rejection than “no, you don’t do it for me” slap in the face? Nope.
I didn’t want you to be lonely over here. Now I have to go clean a bathroom. And tp piles. And torture a cat.
Bailey you save the rejections for tax purposes!
Raine I think you’re right–the glowing rejections (esp for years) have got to be the harest.
Like Jorrie said, I think some rejections can keep you going, while others rip you apart. It all depends on where you’re at in your ‘head’ at the time.
That rejection I got from Harlequin wasn’t all bad - she said I have a smooth, compelling writing style. She said my plot was predictable, though. ah well.
But you’re right - even the “good” rejections still hurt.
I think editors mean well, but what they see as encouraging often comes off as patronizing and condescending or more sympathetic than is professional. I’d rather have a straight-forward assessment of why the story didn’t work for them than a kiss and a cuddle for the boo-boo on my ego.
Mik I see that quite a bit on Rachel Vaters blog http://raleva31.livejournal.com/34111.html
Jorrie, I think your theory is right. And the ‘glowing’ rejections CAN keep you going, give you a bit of hope. But as you said–in the end, even that can be frustrating.
Bailey, thanks for coming to keep me company!
Amie, they’re a special breed of rejection. Maybe the closer you think you are, the more it hurts when you discover you’re not.
Jordan–absolutely. I remember making all the changes I THOUGHT editors would want for the next manuscript, and thinking, “Okay, that’s it. This will definitely be the one!”
Not.
Mik, it’s good that she pinpointed exactly what she thought the problem was.
The only problem with THAT, as we all know, is that another editor might think the plotting was fine but the style needed work.
Lynn, right on the mark.
part of the problem - you never know if the day when your MS gets in front of that editor is the worst day of PMS or if she’d had a huge fight w/ her signif other and is pissed off and she WILL NOT give nyn book a “good” read and will all but tell you to f#$* off - not that I am pesimistic - it’s just that I have heard more than one editor say as much!
sorry - late to the party - but Vegas waits for no one - LOL